By Charlotte Loris-Rodionoff, University College London

In the aftermath of the 2011 Syrian revolution and in the midst of an ongoing war, what does loss mean for Syrians living in Southern Turkey ? How is this loss experienced, and how does it affect Syrians’ everyday lives in Turkey? Those are some of the questions I examined during my PhD fieldwork among Syrians in the city of (Gazi)Antep.

The loss experienced by Syrians can be defined as polymorphic. It is first and foremost the loss of Syria: the loss of one’s home and homeland. This loss was also recounted as the loss of one’s past, one’s former life, the loss of relatives, of kinship ties and networks. Yet, Syrians’ loss is also the loss of a political project, of their revolution and the subsequent loss of one’s revolutionary self.

Turkey constantly appeared during my fieldwork as a space marked by the losses experienced in an elsewhere and in the past: for my research interlocutors, being ‘outside’ (barra) Syria – in Turkey – means having lost the inside (juwa/Syria) and her inside (her former life and self). The outside/Turkey was thus often apprehended through this very loss, which led to everyday practices aiming at reaching out through that which has been lost – whether it is Syria, a home, the past, relatives, etc.

This could be by crossing the border to continue one’s revolutionary project ‘inside’, to meet with relatives and friends not seen for months or years, or more pragmatically to bring back food and medicine from one’s village or city. It was also most often that people would spend an enormous amount of time speaking on the phone to maintain lost family and social networks. In the house where I lived in Turkey, people were constantly speaking on WhatsApp with relatives and friends inside Syria.

Turkey’s urban centres offer opportunities for refugees, but also new spaces of exclusion and exile. (c) Charlotte Loris-Rodionoff, 2016.

The meaning of living outside Syria after having experienced a multi-layered loss ‘inside’ seems perfectly expressed by the story Umm Khaled, a Syrian widow in her fifties, once recounted in my presence:

“Do you remember Abu Ahmad?” she asks her friend, Umm Hala.

“He always used to lose his way in the village. He would never know how to go back home and he would wander around the village not recognising the streets. He never knew where he was. He would turn in vain until someone took him back home. Well, I am like Abu Ahmad now: I don’t know how to go home, and I don’t know where to go next!”

Umm Khaled’s story illustrates how her life lost the certainty and stability it had before fleeing Syria. In Syria, her life seemed clearly mapped out, and she could live it with the same ‘ease’ with which she navigated the streets in her village: her present and future had a sense of certainty. But outside, in Turkey, she became like Abu Ahmad: she is lost in a place she doesn’t know, and she doesn’t know where to go.

By affecting Syrians’ present and everyday lives, the multi-faceted loss they suffered translated into a loss of hope, of certainty and sense that led them to take major life decisions. “Syria is gone”, Umm Yazan, a Syrian woman in her fifties told me before embarking on the perilous journey to Europe. “There is no revolution anymore” she added in an attempt to explain why she was leaving Turkey after having lived there for over two years. What had made her stay and try to settle in Turkey was the hope that she could return to a new Syria in a near future, but after the war intensified, she lost hope that she could go back.

Such feelings were echoed by Umm Khaled: “There is no hope to go back… And even if we go back now we won’t have our lives back. They (the regime’s army and militias) destroyed everything we had”, she told me. Umm Hala added: “I feel like in a big prison in this city! I don’t go out, I don’t know anyone… This is not a life! We just eat and sleep, here. We used to have a life in Syria! But we can’t go back to our lives…”

These three mothers were planning to settle in Antep when I first met them in January 2015, yet they slowly changed their minds as what was supposed to be a temporary exile turned into a permanent one. Their decisions not to remain in Antep were not only linked to the on-going situation in Syria: it was also inflected by the fact that they felt their future was uncertain in Turkey.

Although Turkey has commonly been described as the most welcoming country amongst Syria’s neighbors, Syrians in Turkey are ‘guests’ rather than refugees[1]. If being ‘guests’ was not perceived as an issue when Syrians thought they would quickly return home, the absence of official refugee status became increasingly problematic with the fading possibility of a near return. The absence of clear refugee status and rights subsequently led to a lack of financial support and aid, and to new regulations limiting Syrians’ mobility inside, to and from Turkey, thus increasing the feeling of instability and uncertainty among Syrians in Turkey. These legal and administrative issues directly translated into Syrians’ everyday life and made them feel increasingly unwelcome and unsafe.

When I met Umm Khaled she had been living in Turkey for a year and a half with her 8 year-old daughter and a son in his twenties. Her son left Turkey for Europe with his uncle as the two men saw no future in Turkey. Umm Khaled was thus sharing her tiny studio flat with Umm Mohammad, her sister-in-law, and her five children, who were always around as the school did not accept children who would potentially migrate during the year. Unlike her sister-in-law, Umm Khaled hoped to settle in Antep, despite the everyday hardship, the administrative turmoil and the constant uncertainty that it led to. She sent her daughter to a Turkish school rather than a Syrian one, she looked for a job, and she waited for her youngest son to join her from Lebanon, and help them settle in Antep. However, this hope soon faded away as one of the results of the EU-Turkey deal was to constrain Syrians’ mobility within and to Turkey. Syrians thus needed visas to enter Turkey,[2] and it was very unlikely that she would be reunited with her son, since visas are almost impossible to obtain.

The anxious feeling of being in an “open-air prison”, as Umm Khaled described it, turned into fear after Umm Mohammad’s three year-old son deeply cut his forehead. The sisters-in-law were scared to go to the hospital: What if they were arrested in the hospital and sent back to Syria since her son did not hold kimlik (temporary protection status)? Umm Khaled and I finally went to the hospital, but the staff refused to treat the three year-old, because of the missing document. We tried another public hospital, as the family couldn’t afford a private one. After the doctor fixed the stitches, and as we explained our previous misadventure to the translator, he revealed that after two days no Syrian would be treated for free without a kimlik, even in case of emergency. Umm Khaled was strongly shaken by the news as kimliks were no longer issued. What would happen if she could not get a kimlik for herself and she was in need of medical treatment?

Umm Khaled’s elder son tried to convince his mother to cross the Mediterranean so they could be reunited in Europe. He argued that this would offer his mother and sister the most certain future. However, despite the growing uncertainty and instability in Turkey, Umm Khaled, who had already lost her husband and a child to the revolution, could not imagine losing yet another child to the sea and strongly refused to embark to Greece on a rubber boat.

Umm Khaled, like many Syrians, has experienced a multi-layered form of loss that continues to impact upon her everyday life and her future. She had two martyrs in her family, she had lost her house, her country and was slowly losing hope in the success of the revolution for which her husband and son sacrificed themselves. She had lost her previous life, status and the feeling of relative certainty and safety that came with it. These losses experienced in Syria, were compounded by new losses in exile: the absence of status, of certainty, and the feeling of having lost her future.

* An earlier version of this article was published under the title  “Loss in Times of Revolution and Exile” by Allegra Lab.


[1] Syrians in Turkey are granted ‘kimlik’, which is a temporary protection status delivered by the Turkish AFAD (the state’s Disaster and Emergency Management Authority). Only European citizens can apply for refugee status in Turkey. They can also apply for a residence permit – ikamet – that is not restricted to Syrians as it is a permit for students, workers, etc., and is harder to obtain.

[2] They are required to apply for the visa whilst still within Syria, with barriers to access further compounded by increasing border closures and the construction of a wall across the length of the Syrian-Turkish border.

Featured Image: A town on the Turkey-Syria border (c) C. Loris-Rodionoff


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s